Skip to content

Britain is Morally Bankrupt

February 22, 2015

Alexis Jay’s recently published report, [An] Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham 1997-2013 provides details of the thousands* of young girls abused by men in Rotherham, a town in the north of England. The inquiry may have had a cut-off date but as the executive summary says, “The abuse is not confined to the past but continues to this day.”
*The report says, “[O]ur conservative estimate is that there were more than 1400 victims in the period covered by the inquiry…”

The perpetrators were almost exclusively Pakistani muslims (though some other muslim ethnicities were accused) and the girls were almost exclusively white British. The media, to the extent it covered the story, tried desperately to find non-Pakistani penetrators and non-white British penatratees, but the normative facts of the case remained, i.e. Pakistani men committed depraved sexual acts of gang rape on female white children. And they were children – from ages 11 to 16, drugged and gang raped and then sold on for more gang raping and drugging.

If Pakistani men did the drugging and gang raping, why do I indict Britain? Because of the British establishment’s actions when confronted by the horror.

• These crimes first reached my awareness in 2007 through the British National Party, a.k.a. BNP. Because the BNP is an ethno-nationalist organisation, the claims by the party’s spokesmen and the testimonies of the parents of victims – readily available on the BNP’s website – were dismissed as race hate-mongering lies.
• The police pathologised the victims who reported their gang raping; accusing them of being drug addicts, as “out of control” and essentially gagging for it.
• The Jay Report mentions two cases of fathers who went to the houses where their daughters were being drugged and gang raped and were themselves arrested by the police.
• The media and authorities have used politically correct language to ameliorate the abuse, referring to it as grooming. The children were not groomed, they were drugged almost immediately upon meeting an abuser, and then gang raped. The high off the drugs and the pain and shame of the gang rape created a pathology similar to the army’s Monarch mind control programme; details of which are available on the web. Dismiss MK-Ultra as conspiracy if you wish, but Rotherham shows how a dialectic of depravity works.
• The Report and the media refer to the perpetrators as “Pakistani-heritage”. What need of “heritage”? These men are Pakastanis, some born in Britain, others arrived here at various ages from Pakistan. What’s British about them?
• Rotherham’s MP from 1994-2012, Denis McShane, (who was jailed in 2013 for fraud) admitted doing nothing because, “I think there was a culture of not wanting to rock the multicultural community boat.”
• Despite the horrors revealed, the Rotherham establishment goes unpunished by the courts and the people. After McShane resigned to face fraud charges, the voters elected Sarah Champion, another Labour MP, with an increased vote share. Champion is currently odds-on to retain her seat in May.
• When the UKIP candidate, Jane Collins MEP, sought to launch her campaign in February by having party leader, Nigel Farage MEP come to her HQ, the police allowed a paid mob to blockade the shop and advised Farage not to speak as they “couldn’t guarantee his safety.” Collins had threatened to clean house in Rotherham, including any police complicit in the abuse scandal.
• No one in the Rotherham establishment has been punished; indeed several have gone on to highly paid posts in the quangocracy as if they were competent and blameless.

There was a conspiracy of silence because the powers-that-be suppress any and all malign effects of their multiculturalist ideology, by smearing those who raise their voices against it.
It is clear that thousands of pre-pubescent white girls were, and are, sacrificed to the gods of multiculturalism. The propaganda must not be interrupted by reality, no matter the cost. One would expect the establishment to close ranks, but the 2012 by-election was the perfect opportunity for the voters to send a signal. Sadly the signal they sent was, “Mmmeh!” Champion is odds-on to retain her seat in May.

Compare and contrast Rotherham with another multicultural news item in nearby, Thirsk. A group called Animal Aid secretly filmed the operations at a halal slaughterhouse called Bowood Yorkshire Lamb. Contrary to regulations, the animals were pushed, punched, kicked, killed with blunt knives, killed in the sight of one another, not given sufficient time to bleed out before being moved and painted on post mortem.

The events were a graphic illustration of the “otherness” of muslim practice, but unlike Rotherham, the establishment couldn’t have been more vocal in its condemnation. For example:

• The operatives involved were immediately sacked or suspended.
• The RSPCA described the footage as “absolutely shocking” and called for halal slaughter to be banned.
• The British Veterinary Association “has long believed that slaughter without stunning unnecessarily compromises animal welfare before death and as such we call for an end to its practice.”
• The Food Standards Agency said “There is no excuse for treating animals in the way shown on the video and we are therefore investigating the footage with a view to prosecution.”
• Here is an extract from a statement on the video from Animal Aid’s website: “Animal Aid recognises that, given the existence of strong anti-Muslim sentiment amongst a section of the British population, there is a risk that some people will use the release of our new halal slaughterhouse footage to stir up hatred rather than to advance the cause of animal protection. As an organisation opposed to racism and bigotry, that would be an outcome we would detest. However, withholding release of the footage would be a betrayal of our key mission: to expose and combat animal cruelty…”
Following the exposé, there have been calls for an end to all un-stunned slaughter. The furore is a reaction to the identical un-stunned slaughter of ISIS prisoners in Syria, Iraq and now Libya. It is an obvious displacement of horror at the behaviour of ISIS and others, about which we can do nothing, onto a local issue where we can make a stand. The hypocrisy is stunning.
So, the moral order in post-modern Britain ranks as follows:

– Animal rights
– The multicultural utopia narrative
– Wee girls’ physical safety and mental health

And that is why Britain is morally bankrupt.


From → Chapter 1

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: